Nebraska Gaming Board Spent $30K on Semi-Automatic Weapons

The Nebraska Racing and Gaming Commission (NRGC) spent $30,351 on semi-automatic rifles for its 10 investigators, The Lincoln Journal Star reports.

Nebraska Racing and Gaming Commission, NRGC, SIG MPX rifles
The SIG MPX rifle, which the Nebraska Racing and Gaming Commission says will protect the public against active shooters, was prioritized over the purchase of vehicles for its new investigators. (Image: Shooting Illustrated)

The purchase has raised eyebrows in Lincoln, the state capital. Some lawmakers have questioned whether it’s strictly necessary for an agency tasked with enforcing gaming regulations in the state’s new casino industry to pack fully outfitted SIG Sauer MPX rifles with laser sights.

The additional revelation that the weapons were purchased before the agency bought any new vehicles for its expanded team may have caused even more strain to the eyebrows of Lincoln politicians. The agency currently has just two cars, according to the Journal Star.

Before the advent of casinos in 2022, when the NRGC was focused solely on regulating horse racing, it had just one investigator. Now, its ranks have swelled tenfold.

‘Active Shooter Threat’

NRGC investigator Steve Eppens was forced to defend the purchase to the Journal Star this week. He said that in the event of an active shooter in a casino or racetrack, NRGC agents would have “a duty to intervene and eliminate the threat.”

“We’re in this profession to protect the public. That’s what we do,” he added.

A shoulder-fired rifle, like the SIG MPX, is more accurate than a handgun in such an emergency, minimizing the risk to innocent bystanders, Eppens told the Journal Star.

Meanwhile, Eppens emphasized that all NRGC investigators are considered deputy state sheriffs under state law and have the power to make arrests.

Tried to Cancel

When questions started being raised in the state capitol building, records show that Eppens tried to cancel the order.

I just received a directive from my director that we need to suspend our order of the SIG MPX’s effective immediately,” he wrote to the supplier in November. “There has [sic] been some political issues that have surfaced regarding purchase of equipment and its deployment.

“Our hope is we can work through this and revisit the order of these rifles soon, as they are a very important piece of equipment for the protection of the public, as well as officer safety,” he wrote.

But it was too late. The supplier couldn’t cancel the order because the guns were being custom-fitted, and the work had already begun.

Philip Conneller
Philip Conneller Senior Reporter

In Philip Conneller’s eight years with Casino.org, he has covered the gaming industry from Las Vegas to Macau and everything in between. He currently focuses his coverage on gaming law, white-collar crime, global money laundering, tribal gaming, politics, and regulation.

Philip was the original features editor for poker’s Bluff Magazine and editor for Bluff Europe, which he helped launch. His writing has also been featured in ESPN, Forbes, Time Out, The Sun, and The Daily Star, as well as iGaming Business, eGaming Review, and numerous other industry news and tech websites.

His news stories for Casino.org/news have been linked by The Washington Post, The Daily Mail, People Magazine, and Jimmy Fallon's Tonight Show, among many others.

Philip once won $20,000 with 7-2 off-suit. He has been reprimanded for unwittingly playing Elton John’s piano on two separate occasions on both sides of the Atlantic.

He became a writer because he is a lousy pianist.

Philip lives outside London with his wife and children, where he spends his time agonizing about Arsenal FC.

Contact Philip at philip.conneller@casino.org.

Comments icon

Conversation (2 comments)

+ Add a comment
  • M
    Mark January 23, 2024
    They are law enforcement officers. There is no reason to question the fact they ultimately have the responsibility of protecting innocent lives. (Look at the… They are law enforcement officers. There is no reason to question the fact they ultimately have the responsibility of protecting innocent lives. (Look at the Las Vegas shooting in 2017) Eppens sounds like a little wimp who pees on himself and roles onto the ground crying every time someone questions a decision. He should probably learn to stand up for what is right and tell ignorant law makers and commission members the reason behind purchases rather then trying to undo legitimate business needs..... Also, this article has the wrong firearm pictured. Good job reporters. "eye role".
    Reply
  • K
    Karl January 22, 2024
    As the gaming industry continues to evolve, the Commission needs to reassess its priorities.
    Reply

Write a comment

Your email address will not be published.