Bridgeport Casino Push Predicted to Go ‘Belly-Up’

Connecticut’s controversial Bridgeport casino push was approved by the House of Representatives on Friday, but is likely to die in the Senate, according to political observers in the state.

Bridgeport casino faces heavy lift in Senate
Bridgeport casino supporters, including MGM Resorts, claimed a big victory in Connecticut’s House of Representatives on Friday but  a bill that would begin the request for referral process is going to be a heavy lift in the Senate. (Image: WNPR)

The bill does not mention Bridgeport by name – or MGM Resorts International. It would merely create a “request for referral process” for operators to submit proposals for a commercial casino resort in Connecticut, provided they are willing to invest at least $500 million. But as it stands, there is only one real destination in the running, and only one prospective operator.

MGM Resorts has long been at war with the states’ two federally recognized tribes over a satellite casino proposed for Connecticut’s northern border, just miles from where it is putting the finishing touches to a $950 million resort in Springfield Massachusetts.

Political Victory

MGM attempted to persuade the Mohegans and Mashantucket Pequots that Bridgeport would be a more economically viable area for their casino – conveniently about as far away from Springfield, Massachusetts as possible.

When the tribes refused, the casino giant offered to do it themselves. The tribes dismissed this as a stunt, but Bridgeport, which has long wanted a casino in the area, has largely embraced the idea.

The bill’s narrow passage (by a 77-73 vote) in the House on Friday is being touted as a big political victory for proponents of the Bridgeport casino, but it’s predicted to have a much tougher ride in the Senate this week.

With just to days to go until the end of the legislative session, and the bill needing 19 votes in the 36-member chamber, political correspondent for NBC Connecticut Max Reiss said it’s difficult to see where the required votes of support would be coming from.

Opposition Bloc

He named numerous senators who would not vote for a Bridgeport Casino if their lives depended on it, either because they are against gambling expansion, or because they support the tribal casino, or because they fear losing revenue-sharing payments from the tribes, as has been threatened.

The merits of the Bridgeport casino can be debated, and they have been in Connecticut for years,” Reiss wrote. “It’s possible that MGM is exactly right, that a Bridgeport casino can capture the New York market and be successful in ways an East Windsor casino can only dream of.

“However, with just two days remaining for lawmakers to meet and after hitting the jackpot with Friday’s House vote, it looks more like the tribes may have the political upper hand, leading Bridgeport’s push to go belly-up.”

Philip Conneller
Philip Conneller Senior Reporter

In Philip Conneller’s eight years with Casino.org, he has covered the gaming industry from Las Vegas to Macau and everything in between. He currently focuses his coverage on gaming law, white-collar crime, global money laundering, tribal gaming, politics, and regulation.

Philip was the original features editor for poker’s Bluff Magazine and editor for Bluff Europe, which he helped launch. His writing has also been featured in ESPN, Forbes, Time Out, The Sun, and The Daily Star, as well as iGaming Business, eGaming Review, and numerous other industry news and tech websites.

His news stories for Casino.org/news have been linked by The Washington Post, The Daily Mail, People Magazine, and Jimmy Fallon's Tonight Show, among many others.

Philip once won $20,000 with 7-2 off-suit. He has been reprimanded for unwittingly playing Elton John’s piano on two separate occasions on both sides of the Atlantic.

He became a writer because he is a lousy pianist.

Philip lives outside London with his wife and children, where he spends his time agonizing about Arsenal FC.

Contact Philip at philip.conneller@casino.org.

Comments icon

Conversation (0)

+ Add a comment

Be the first to comment on this article.

Write a comment

Your email address will not be published.