Sheldon Adelson and LVS Corp Pushing for New York City Casino

LVS chief and chair Sheldon Adelson has his eyes on a casino in New York City, which is why he’s been busy aligning himself with some of New York State’s key movers and shakers in the worlds of business and politics, Politico reports.

Sheldon Adelson
Sheldon Adelson has kickstarted a conversation about a New York City casino with influential politicians and business people, but is the state legislature prepared to change its mind for a Republican megadonor? (Image: Bill Clark/Getty)

One of the aforementioned is the president and chief executive for the influential Partnership for New York City, Kathryn Wylde, who confirmed to the politics magazine that LVS had been in touch.

Wylde’s organization comprises 300 CEOs from New York City’s top corporate, investment and entrepreneurial firms and focuses on research and policy formulation to promote economic health and development.

“They just wanted to tell us that they’re eager to do something, and that they do things at a high-end, grand scale,” Wylde told Politico. “They’re looking for civic support.”

Networking Effort

Adelson is also looking for support at state government level, especially from those closely connected to Governor Andrew Cuomo. For a New York City casino to be realized, the politicians would first need to intervene — although Politico notes the Republican megadonor may struggle to curry favor with the political classes in one of the bluest states in the nation.

Undeterred, LVS has hired Cuomo’s former operations chief, Howard Glaser, as a consultant, as well as Kivvit, the lobbying firm that employs Cuomo’s 2018 campaign manager, Maggie Moran, and Cuomo’s former communications director, Rich Bamberger.

The company –- no fan of unions –- has even met with Peter Ward, the head of New York’s powerful hotel workers union and has guaranteed the union the right to organize at any future New York casino, according to Politico.

Could a New York City Casino Happen?

In 2013, voters in New York State approved Proposition One, amending the constitution to authorize the licensing of up to seven private commercial casinos. A year later, four licenses were made available in four different upstate areas on the proviso that no casinos could be built downstate for seven years. But that could be changed by legislative mandate.

In 2016, when New Jersey voters were asked whether they wanted to break Atlantic City’s monopoly on gaming and establish a casino in the North Jersey New York metropolitan area, several New York lawmakers said they were prepared to tear up the downstate prohibition because the damage a North Jersey casino could do to the New York casino sector.

The point became moot when New Jersyans roundly rejected the proposal.

Philip Conneller
Philip Conneller Senior Reporter

In Philip Conneller’s eight years with Casino.org, he has covered the gaming industry from Las Vegas to Macau and everything in between. He currently focuses his coverage on gaming law, white-collar crime, global money laundering, tribal gaming, politics, and regulation.

Philip was the original features editor for poker’s Bluff Magazine and editor for Bluff Europe, which he helped launch. His writing has also been featured in ESPN, Forbes, Time Out, The Sun, and The Daily Star, as well as iGaming Business, eGaming Review, and numerous other industry news and tech websites.

His news stories for Casino.org/news have been linked by The Washington Post, The Daily Mail, People Magazine, and Jimmy Fallon's Tonight Show, among many others.

Philip once won $20,000 with 7-2 off-suit. He has been reprimanded for unwittingly playing Elton John’s piano on two separate occasions on both sides of the Atlantic.

He became a writer because he is a lousy pianist.

Philip lives outside London with his wife and children, where he spends his time agonizing about Arsenal FC.

Contact Philip at philip.conneller@casino.org.

Comments icon

Conversation (0)

+ Add a comment

Be the first to comment on this article.

Write a comment

Your email address will not be published.