Lottoland Amps Up Row with Australian Government Over Secondary Lotteries

Lottoland is fighting back against ALNA, the organization that spearheaded the push to criminalize secondary lotteries in Australia, as it called once again for Aussie lawmakers to reconsider the proposed ban.

Lottoland CEO Luke Brill raises doubts about ALNA
Lottoland CEO Luke Brill has said he is concerned ALNA has misled the government about its membership numbers and raised concerns about its alleged precarious financial situation. (Image: The Australian)

ALNA (the Australian Lotteries and Newsagents Association) is an industry body representing lottery operators and vendors (a newsagent is the catch-all term in the country for the newsstands and corner stores that distribute traditional lottery tickets).

ALNA orchestrated a high-profile media blitz against Lottoland, claiming that the company’s disruptive lottery betting model was threatening the livelihoods of newsagents and denying lotteries revenues that would normally go to good causes.

“Lottoland’s Gotta Go” bought TV spots and full-page advertisements in newspapers as it sought to discredit Lottoland and its business model.

The campaign worked. Legislation has been introduced to the Australian parliament to ban secondary lotteries, which will be debated this month.

The Uber of Lotteries

Lottoland offers its customers the chance to “bet” on foreign lottery draws from across the globe by creating synthetic mirror versions of those draws. Participants have the chance to win the same jackpots they would in the real lotteries, and Lottoland is insured by up to $123 million a year against big wins.

But Lottoland said this week that it had discovered previously unpublished documents, filed to Australia’s securities commission (ASIC), which suggest ALNA had misled the government. Lottoland CEO Luke Brill said the documents show that the organization does not represent 4,000 newsagents, as claimed. In fact, it has only 707 paid members.

“These ASIC documents raise serious questions about the financial situation at ALNA and its ability to continue to operate as a going concern, let alone to represent the interest of its members,” said Brill. “According to ALNA’s own auditors, the organisation is in financial disarray, with the auditors telling ASIC that there is ‘significant uncertainty’ as to whether the group will continue as a going concern.”

‘Smear Campaign’

Lottoland has argued the ALNA backlash against its business has been little more than a smear campaign, designed to protect Tatts’ semi-monopoly on Australian lotteries.

Earlier this month, Brill offered to strike a profit-sharing deal with the country’s newsagents that would them allow them to earn an affiliate commission of 20 percent of the profits for every bet they refer to Lottoland.

Rather than address the shocking state of its financial affairs … ALNA has inexplicably taken part in an AU$5 million ($3.8 million) lobbying campaign to convince the government to ban online lottery betting, which will leave newsagents at the mercy of a Tabcorp (Tatts) monopoly,” Brill said.

ALNA Strikes Back

On Wednesday, ALNA hit back against Brill’s claims, stating that it is “solvent and is trading within the confines of the law.”

“Any suggestion to the contrary by deliberately misrepresenting ANF financial information is unethical and defamatory,” it said.

“There has not been any misrepresentation of figures of any kind by ALNA – only by Lottoland who have been aggressively spreading defamatory rumours based on inaccurate and incomplete information,” it continued, adding that it represented 2,000 member newsagents and had never claimed anything to the contrary.

ALNA said it had instructed its lawyers to pursue all legal avenues against the “false claims” made by Lottoland.

Philip Conneller
Philip Conneller Senior Reporter

In Philip Conneller’s eight years with Casino.org, he has covered the gaming industry from Las Vegas to Macau and everything in between. He currently focuses his coverage on gaming law, white-collar crime, global money laundering, tribal gaming, politics, and regulation.

Philip was the original features editor for poker’s Bluff Magazine and editor for Bluff Europe, which he helped launch. His writing has also been featured in ESPN, Forbes, Time Out, The Sun, and The Daily Star, as well as iGaming Business, eGaming Review, and numerous other industry news and tech websites.

His news stories for Casino.org/news have been linked by The Washington Post, The Daily Mail, People Magazine, and Jimmy Fallon's Tonight Show, among many others.

Philip once won $20,000 with 7-2 off-suit. He has been reprimanded for unwittingly playing Elton John’s piano on two separate occasions on both sides of the Atlantic.

He became a writer because he is a lousy pianist.

Philip lives outside London with his wife and children, where he spends his time agonizing about Arsenal FC.

Contact Philip at philip.conneller@casino.org.

Comments icon

Conversation (1 comment)

+ Add a comment
  • PS
    Peter SMITH May 3, 2018
    I used Lottoland a coupleof times until I checked out the price of their tickets in overseas lotteries to the local in country price:… I used Lottoland a coupleof times until I checked out the price of their tickets in overseas lotteries to the local in country price: outrageous mark up. I also checked out the fine print which basically says they own the ticket and will pay you what they deem fair. they have the money and you don't . Try funding a legal case against them in the event you win.
    Reply

Write a comment

Your email address will not be published.