Red Rock Resorts Loses Bid to Derail Long-Running Station Casinos Labor Cases

Key Points

  • A federal judge dismissed Red Rock Resorts’ constitutional challenge to the NLRB but allowed the company to amend its complaint
  • The underlying labor cases include allegations Station Casinos used pandemic-era layoffs and rehiring decisions to weaken union representation
  • Red Rock Casino was ordered to bargain with the Culinary Union after labor officials found Station improperly influenced a 2019 election

Red Rock Resorts has lost a federal court bid to halt sprawling labor proceedings stemming from years of allegations the operator illegally sought to undermine unions at their Las Vegas properties.

Keywords: Red Rock Resorts, Station Casinos, NLRB, Culinary Union, Las Vegas casinos
Red Rock Casino Resort, above, was among the Station Casinos properties at the center of a yearslong battle with the Culinary Union and federal labor regulators. (Image: Shutterstock)

U.S. District Judge Anne Traum last week dismissed a lawsuit brought by Red Rock Resorts, its Station Casinos brand, and numerous affiliated casino entities that challenged the constitutionality of the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB).

The lawsuit was an attempt to stop two ongoing NLRB proceedings involving allegations of unfair labor practices across the Station Casinos group.

Rather than addressing those allegations in the suit, Red Rock argued that aspects of the NLRB itself were unconstitutional. Among other things, it claimed federal law makes it too difficult for the US president to remove NLRB board members and administrative judges, improperly limiting presidential authority.

Red Rock also argued the agency exercises an unconstitutional combination of powers because it can investigate and prosecute alleged labor violations while also playing a role in deciding those disputes.

Traum rejected the claims, finding Red Rock had failed to show that the NLRB’s structure had actually caused it harm. The judge noted that even if restrictions on removing NLRB officials were unconstitutional, that would not automatically invalidate decisions made by officials who were legally appointed.

The case was dismissed without prejudice, meaning Red Rock has an opportunity to amend its complaint and try again.

Years-Long Union Battle

Station Casinos’ battle with organized labor in Las Vegas dates back to 2018, when the NLRB launched the first of many proceedings arising from unfair-labor-practice complaints.

In 2021, the NLRB issued a complaint alleging Station used layoffs and other workforce changes during the COVID-19 pandemic to weaken union support.

The agency alleged Station selectively laid off, terminated, recalled, rehired, and transferred workers in ways designed to reduce union representation. It also accused the company of encouraging efforts to remove union representation at some properties and of rewarding employees who opposed unionization.

Station denied the allegations, accusing the NLRB of unfair and biased treatment.

In a separate dispute at Red Rock Casino Resort, employees voted 54% to 46% against union representation in 2019.

An NLRB administrative law judge later found Station had improperly influenced the vote by announcing enhanced employee benefits in the run-up to the election and threatening employees with the loss of those benefits if they voted for the union.

In 2024, the NLRB upheld findings that Red Rock had violated federal labor law and ordered the casino to recognize and bargain with the union, despite the election result.

Constitutional Challenge

Red Rock launched its constitutional challenge in October 2024 while the wider NLRB proceedings remained pending. The company initially sought an injunction that would have prevented the labor cases from continuing.

Traum rejected that request in September 2025, and Red Rock appealed. The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the decision in April.

The case then returned to the Nevada federal court, where the NLRB and the Las Vegas union sought its dismissal.

Traum granted those requests September 23, leaving the underlying labor proceedings against Station Casinos intact while allowing Red Rock another opportunity to amend its constitutional claims.

Philip Conneller
Philip Conneller Senior Reporter

In Philip Conneller’s eight years with Casino.org, he has covered the gaming industry from Las Vegas to Macau and everything in between. He currently focuses his coverage on gaming law, white-collar crime, global money laundering, tribal gaming, politics, and regulation.

Philip was the original features editor for poker’s Bluff Magazine and editor for Bluff Europe, which he helped launch. His writing has also been featured in ESPN, Forbes, Time Out, The Sun, and The Daily Star, as well as iGaming Business, eGaming Review, and numerous other industry news and tech websites.

His news stories for Casino.org/news have been linked by The Washington Post, The Daily Mail, People Magazine, and Jimmy Fallon's Tonight Show, among many others.

Philip once won $20,000 with 7-2 off-suit. He has been reprimanded for unwittingly playing Elton John’s piano on two separate occasions on both sides of the Atlantic.

He became a writer because he is a lousy pianist.

Philip lives outside London with his wife and children, where he spends his time agonizing about Arsenal FC.

Contact Philip at philip.conneller@casino.org.

Comments icon

Conversation (0)

+ Add a comment

Be the first to comment on this article.

Write a comment

Your email address will not be published.