Long Island Casino Environmental Review Moves Forward

Amid legal challenges from Hofstra University, an environmental review that’s a necessary component of Las Vegas Sands’ efforts to potentially build a casino hotel in Long Island, NY is proceeding.

Sands Long Island
Nassau Coliseum. The town of Hempstead, N.Y. says it’s taking the lead in an environmental review related to a Las Vegas Sands casino proposal. (Image: LongIsland.com)

On Tuesday, policymakers in the town of Hempstead voted unanimously to make the town the go-to regulator for the State Environmental Quality Review Act exercise. That study will determine the viability of Sands’ plan to build a $4 billion casino resort at the site of the Nassau Veterans Memorial Coliseum in Uniondale, NY.

Hempstead halted efforts to take the lead in the State Environmental Quality Review Act procedure last month. That’s when New York State Supreme Court Judge Sarika Kapoor ruled that Nassau County’s transfer of Coliseum’s lease to Sands violated  New York’s open meeting laws. That ruling was later subject to a hold issued by the appellate division of the New York State Supreme Court.

Hofstra, the plaintiff in the suit heard by Kapoor, has asserted that Nassau County officials didn’t give the public adequate avenues or time to make their voices heard on the casino issue. That’s while other groups opposing the project claimed no efforts have been made on the environmental review process.

Hempstead, Sands Look for Transparency

Opponents of the Nassau County casino plan have alleged lawmakers approved the deal with Sands in a backroom fashion, and that processes concerning related regulatory reviews have been shrouded from public comment.

Conversely, supporters of the integrated resort assert that Long Island politicians have made abundantly clear their backing of the Sands proposal, noting that there have been numerous meetings at which residents voiced endorsements for the project.

As for the environmental review process, Hempstead lawmakers voted to use a review drafted by Sands as a template and to hold two related review sessions on January 18 at the Long Island Marriott in Uniondale.

The Uniondale Chamber of Commerce is among the groups backing the Sands proposal. The chamber leader noted many local businesses, including restaurants, are supportive of the Sands casino proposal. For LVS, the location is desirable because Nassau County is the second-most populous county in New York after New York City. Additionally, Long Island is a short drive to the Kennedy and LaGuardia airports.

Environmental Review Critical Piece of Puzzle

Legal experts speculate that Hofstra’s case centers around sending Nassau County and Sands back to square one, potentially betting that a lengthy legal battle will prevent the county and the gaming company from being prepared to credibly bid for one the three downstate casino licenses New York regulators could award next year.

Both the county and Sands have made clear they intend to forge ahead regardless of Hofstra’s legal efforts. That makes a comprehensive and transparent environmental review essential to rebutting Hofstra’s claims.

It’s also critical to help expedite the legal process because New York’s higher courts are suffering through backlogs and are taking years to hear some environmental review cases.

Todd Shriber
Todd Shriber Financial Reporter

Todd Shriber is a senior news reporter covering gaming financials, casino business, stocks, and mergers and acquisitions for Casino.org.

Todd got his start in financial markets as a reporter with Bloomberg News. Later, he became a trader at a Southern California-based long/short hedge fund, where he specialized in the trading sector and international ETFs leading up to and during the financial crisis. He joined Casino.org in 2019.

Currently, Todd analyzes, researches, and writes on ETFs for various web-based publications and financial services firms. Shriber has been featured and quoted in Barron's, CNBC.com, and The Wall Street Journal. His work can also be found on Benzinga, ETF Daily News, ETF Trends, MarketWatch, Fox Business, and Nasdaq.com.

He currently resides in Las Vegas, where he enjoys golf and taking his black lab to the dog park. He's also an avid sports fan and likes to wager on college football and the NBA. You can also find him at the three-card poker and roulette table, even though he knows better.

Contact Todd at todd.shriber@casino.org.

Comments icon

Conversation (2 comments)

+ Add a comment
  • R
    RAC December 8, 2023
    Hofstra is not “betting” on anything. It was clear to everyone at the time the lease was approved that it was being rushed to… Hofstra is not “betting” on anything. It was clear to everyone at the time the lease was approved that it was being rushed to avoid scrutiny and laws were being blatantly violated. The County knew that if the residents became fully aware as to how massive the casino complex would be, the majority of residents would oppose the plan. This is borne out by a recent Newsday poll where Nassau County residents oppose the casino 49-42. Residents of Nassau County owe a debt of gratitude to Hofstra for holding the County accountable for its actions. The County should stop wasting millions in legal fees on an appeal and redo the lease process - this time following the laws that were designed to protect us.
    Reply
  • SR
    Steve Rolston December 8, 2023
    Sands own environmental review seems usable ONLY as a template. There needs to be a truly independent Environmental Impact Assessment to get accurate numbers on… Sands own environmental review seems usable ONLY as a template. There needs to be a truly independent Environmental Impact Assessment to get accurate numbers on the amount of water and energy to be used, the amount of sewage will be generated, and the amount of drilling to be done for the new well. How will our air and water be affected? Will water tables rise as they sink foundations in to support the hotel towers and parking lots? Surely we are not leaving it up to Sands to provide the necessary information for the full environmental review.
    Reply

Write a comment

Your email address will not be published.