State College Casino Opposition Calls on University to Reject Bally’s Project
Posted on: April 11, 2022, 02:54h.
Last updated on: April 14, 2022, 08:28h.
The proposed State College casino near the Penn State University campus has generated stern opposition from the local community. But one voice that hasn’t yet weighed in on the matter is the most influential entity in all of Centre County: the school itself.
Bally’s has proposed spending $123 million to reimagine the former Macy’s department store at the Nittany Mall into a Category 4 mini-casino. The shopping center is less than four miles from Penn State’s main campus in University Park.
Bally’s acquired the rights to the satellite casino by partnering with Ira Lubert, a Penn State University alumnus and former board trustee. Lubert was permitted to bid on the Category 4 auction round in September of 2020 because of his previous ownership position in the Valley Forge Casino Resort. Lubert won the auction with a $10 million tender.
Lubert and Bally’s are targeting the former Macy’s for a casino with up to 750 slot machines, 30 table games, and a sportsbook. However, the Pennsylvania Gaming Control Board (PGCB) has fielded hundreds of letters opposing the casino. Letters in opposition have far outweighed letters of support. The state typically fields such community input when considering new land-based casinos.
Local Seeks University Comment
The PGCB held a public input hearing regarding the proposed Nittany Mall casino in August. The College Township Council unanimously approved a land development plan from Bally’s to use the mall space for gaming in September.
The Bally’s team must still go before the PGCB to present its full plan for the 94,000-square-foot casino before the state gaming regulatory agency will vote on issuing the casino operator the Category 4 license. No date for such a presentation has yet been announced.
Daniel M., a resident of nearby Howard, has been a vocal critic of the Bally’s Penn State casino plan. He has written letters and op-eds to local media urging others to tell the PGCB to deny Bally’s a gaming license. He has also commented on Casino.org’s coverage of the casino undertaking.
Daniel M. is now calling on Penn State to end its silence on the casino controversy. In a letter addressed to outgoing Penn State University President Eric Barron, the Howard resident contends that the president’s silence might mean that he’s hoping to pass the provocative issue on to his successor.
“Regarding this future chaos a casino would bring to our college town, this absolute silence from [Penn State] should not remain in place until after your retirement parties in early May. Please break Penn State University’s silence about the casino and speak out,” he said in his letter, as published by StateCollege.com.
“Our community’s concern regarding Penn State’s silence about the planned casino will not just fade away, as you may have hoped,” he added.
Successor Might Take Stance
Barron is set to retire effective May 9. His successor — President-elect Dr. Neeli Bendapudi — arrives from the University of Louisville. She plans to be a more outspoken leader regarding community affairs.
The goodness of what comes out of Penn State should first be felt by the community of State College, then the commonwealth, then the country, and then the world. So you will see me quite active in the community,” Dr. Bendapudi said recently.
Bally’s claims plenty of good would come out of its Nittany Mall casino. The Rhode Island-based gaming company projects that the satellite casino would create hundreds of new jobs, generate new local tax revenue, and reinvigorate the desolate mall.
Last Comments ( 5 )
The PGCB accepted public feedback regarding this casino proposal by e-mail at boardclerk@pa.gov until Sunday, June 12th, 2022 at 5:00 pm. A total of 996 messages opposing the proposed casino were submitted directly to the PGCB before the feedback deadline. An additional 575 messages were recorded via the online petition opposing the casino and also submitted before the deadline. Additionally, online and hard-copy petitions opposing the casino were both submitted before the deadline including signatures from at least 3,300 distinct individuals who would be negatively impacted by the proposed casino. Across all of these sources, a total of 4,871 messages of all types have been submitted in opposition to the proposed casino, whereas only 99 messages of all types have been submitted in support of the project. For more information about why the proposed casino would be a bad bet for the Nittany Mall, State College, and Penn State University, please visit https://www.saynocasino.org.
a casino in the mall is needed,as the mall is dying-its only a matter of time.i believe the benefits outweigh the detractions!! and the jobs it would create would be wonderful for the area!! lets get it built!!
A small local casino near State College will provide economic support for the central PA area. Impact caused by increased traffic is minimal. The scenic beauty of the seven mountains will be appreciated by more people and tourist the tourist industry would benefit. The eastend of State College has lost many retail stores and resturants in the last decade. Most of the Nittany Mall is empty! Econmic revival is essential to provide opportunities and jobs,
I am a former resident of State College (22 years) as well as a former resident (5 years) of a casino town, Lake Tahoe, CA. I believe my history allows me to speak to the issue of potential impact of a casino on State College with a voice that is weighted with more than mere opinion. Certainly, as proponents claim, a casino will bring in more jobs, tax revenues and revitalize a dying Mall; also, I can assure you Bailey’s will make every effort possible to be a good neighbor to the community. Those are all positive reasons that look very good….on the surface. But a local casino will, in time, touch and bring many less positive changes to every person and aspect of life in State College even for those residents who never set foot inside the business. Those changes will directly affect local quality of life. To state what you all know so well, big changes are coming to State College. Now is a time of opportunity to wisely consider the form and potential direction of those changes in order to preserve quality of life into the future of this wonderful place we all love to call Happy Valley. I had a good job in Lake Tahoe, comfortable home near the lake and loved the magnificent Natural beauty of the region. But five years was all I could take of figuratively “living in the shadows of the casinos.” I pray that State College does not become a smaller version of that kind of place. Erroll Wilson
Daniel is only one of many in Happy Valley who are calling on Penn State's leadership to speak out against the proposed casino at the Nittany Mall: https://www.statecollege.com/letters-pa-needs-better-education-funding-climate-change-security-risk-voter-suppression-will-psu-leaders-speak-out-on-casino/