Penn National Casino Workers Who Smoke File Class Action Lawsuit Against Company
Posted on: November 18, 2021, 08:44h.
Last updated on: November 18, 2021, 10:35h.
Penn National Gaming (PNG) is the defendant in a class action lawsuit brought by some 1,500 employees who work inside the company’s casinos and who regularly smoke tobacco.
![Penn National casino smoking](https://www.casino.org/news/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/237055775_baa84ef9a8_z.jpeg)
In a lawsuit first filed in Missouri last year, PNG workers in at least two states say their employer has been wrongly deducting a $50 monthly charge from their paychecks because they are smokers. Penn contends that the money is used to help offset some of the higher insurance premiums it pays to cover the self-admitted tobacco users.
The case has since moved from Platte County Circuit Court to the federal Western District of Missouri. Attorneys representing the more than 1,500 plaintiffs allege that PNG did little to encourage the workers to complete a smoking cessation program in order to avoid the surcharge.
Part of the reason something like a notice is so important here, especially if you’re legitimately concerned about your employees’ health, is you want them to complete the tobacco cessation program,” representing attorney Alex Ricke told NPR in Kansas City.
PNG told Casino.org that the company does not comment on pending litigation.
Lawsuit Seeks Lost Wages
Penn National operates 41 casinos in 19 states and has some 18,000 workers. The lawsuit predominantly involves PNG employees at the company’s Argosy Casino Riverside and Hollywood Casino St. Louis — both in Missouri — and Hollywood Casino at Kansas Speedway in Kansas.
The plaintiffs argue that even those who did complete a smoking cessation program often continued to be hit with the $50 monthly fee.
This week, US District Judge Stephen Bough allowed the class action lawsuit against PNG to proceed to a formal hearing.
Bough ruled that allowing the class action suit to continue is in the best interest of all, as “The monetary amounts of the tobacco surcharge would not likely be worth the filing of separate lawsuits.”
The legal challenge is expected to boil down to determining whether the tobacco surcharges violate amendments of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) and Penn’s fiduciary duty to the plan’s participants.
Health insurance costs for known smokers are substantially higher than they are for nonsmokers. The New England Journal of Medicine reports that health care premiums are as much as 40 percent higher.
The Irony
The class action attorneys say it’s more than a bit ironic that Penn National is penalizing its workers who smoke when at least part of their workplaces permit indoor tobacco use. Casino smoking is allowed inside Penn’s properties in both Kansas and Missouri, where the plaintiffs work.
“Part of the enjoyment of going to the casino has been being able to smoke,” opined Missouri Gaming Commission Chairman Mike Leara earlier this year.
Missouri requires casinos to designate smoking and smoke-free gaming sections. But in Kansas, casinos are free to allow indoor tobacco use throughout their casino space.
The CDC says people who do not smoke but are exposed to secondhand smoke at work experience a 25-30 percent increased risk of developing heart disease.
Related News Articles
David Baazov Forms New Global Investment Company
Most Popular
LOST VEGAS: The Foster Brooks Robot at MGM Grand
Bally’s Sets Date for Tropicana Las Vegas Implosion & Party
Most Commented
-
VEGAS MYTHS RE-BUSTED: You Don’t Have to Pay Resort Fees
August 2, 2024 — 16 Comments— -
VEGAS MYTHS RE-BUSTED: Elvis Was a Straight-Up Racist
August 9, 2024 — 11 Comments— -
ANTI-SOCIAL BEHAVIOR: Vegas Casino Buffet Stunt in Poor Taste Goes Viral
August 16, 2024 — 7 Comments— -
VEGAS MYTHS RE-BUSTED: The Strip Tried Appealing to Families and Failed
August 23, 2024 — 7 Comments—
Last Comments ( 2 )
Is their anyway they could add the Lawrenceburg Indiana property to the lawsuit.. I am a previous employee Richard Hartmeyer and we challenged the smoking sensation fee with no positive results.. The employees were angered do to the company not providing a smoke free environment.. So in a sense non smoker's are essentially smoking and not being charged the fee .
Gee...I wonder if they charge extra for employees who drink alcohol? are on medication? are overweight? drive over the speed limit? drive motorcycles? consume sugar?....etc.etc...No the only group you are allowed to and actually encouraged to discriminate against is smokers.. This has to stop....ALL ANTI-SMOKING agendas must end!!!!! They are discriminatory!!!