State College Casino Has New Majority Ownership in Saratoga

Posted on: June 26, 2025, 09:55h. 

Last updated on: June 30, 2025, 01:05h.

  • The State College casino project in Pennsylvania will soon have a new majority owner
  • Saratoga Casino Holdings is taking over the Nittany Mall project

On Wednesday, the Pennsylvania Gaming Control Board (PGCB), subject to several pending conditions, approved the majority ownership transfer of the forthcoming State College casino being constructed at the Nittany Mall just miles from the Penn State University Park Main Campus.

State College casino Happy Valley Lubert Saratoga
A billboard in College Township opposes a casino in State College at the Nittany Mall near Penn State University. This week, the Pennsylvania Gaming Control Board approved a new ownership structure of the so-called Happy Valley Casino. (Image: Submitted)

Following a public hearing that ran about an hour and 10 minutes, state gaming regulators provisionally signed off on upstate New York-based Saratoga Casino Holdings becoming the majority owner of SC Gaming, the company that won the state’s September 2020 auction round for a Category 4 casino license with a $10,000,101 bid.

Ira Lubert, a Penn State alumnus and former chair of the university’s board of trustees, was the winning bidder behind SC Gaming OpCo, LLC, the entity that made the $10 million tender. After initially partnering with Bally’s Corp. to develop and manage the so-called “mini-casino” that can initially house up to 750 slot machines and 30 live-dealer table games, plus a sportsbook, Bally’s withdrew from the project last September to focus on its Chicago resort.

Lubert, who said following Bally’s exit that he had the financial resources “to independently develop and operate” the casino, chose to bring on Saratoga in a pact announced in March. The announcement included the terms that Lubert would sell a 60% majority stake in the enterprise.

Third Lubert Casino Investment

Lubert is skilled in taking advantage of Pennsylvania’s ownership and casino category laws. Perhaps no individual has made more money off the state’s 2017 expansion of gaming, which authorized Cat. 4 mini-casinos and allowed “resort” casinos to expand their operations at greatly discounted entry costs compared with full-scale casinos.

Lubert was part of the development team of one such Cat. 3 resort in Valley Forge Casino Resort. In 2012, the firm paid the state a $5 million licensing fee to bring 500 slots to the property, which took the place of the hotel’s former convention center.

Opened for $132.5 million, the Category 3 Valley Forge Casino Resort license allowed only hotel and/or property guests, along with patrons who purchased memberships, to gamble. The 2017 expansion allowed Cat. 3 casinos to remove their entry limitations for $1 million, expand their gaming operations to include table games for $1 million, and add another 250 slot machines for $2.5 million.

While Cat. 1 and 2 casinos in Pennsylvania paid $50 million each for slots and table game privileges, Lubert’s Valley Forge paid about $9.5 million. Though the resort can only operate up to 850 slot machines and 50 tables, considerably fewer than the Cat. 1 and 2 casinos, Valley Forge’s expansion made the property attractive for acquisition.

In 2018, just months after Pennsylvania lawmakers and then-Gov. Tom Wolf (D) signed the 2017 gaming expansion, Las Vegas-based Boyd Gaming paid Lubert and his Valley Forge co-owners $281 million for the King of Prussia property.

Lubert, who was also an early investor in what became Rivers Casino Pittsburgh, saw yet another opportunity in the state’s authorization of Cat. 4 casinos. After bidding ran dry for the satellite properties and the PGCB welcomed in individual stakeholders in slot licenses, Lubert bid and formed an entity called SC Gaming OpCo, LLC, for his casino in State College, home to College Township, which didn’t opt out of being considered for a satellite gaming property.

Baltimore-based Cordish Companies, which was outbid by Lubert during the September 2020 auction, unsuccessfully contested that Lubert wasn’t the lone investor in SC Gaming OpCo but had orchestrated a scheme with partners who weren’t qualified to participate. In the case that reached the state Supreme Court, the judicial finding was that Lubert retained full control of the LLC despite “various individuals and entities” contributing funds toward the $10 million winning bid payment. 

SC Gaming Finds New Partner

Lubert and SC Gaming repeatedly said they weren’t looking to immediately transfer the ownership of the College Township casino license. But on Wednesday, they presented the PGCB with a new ownership structure, with a new entity — SC Gaming HoldCo, LLC — with Saratoga possessing 60% of the enterprise and SC Gaming, LLC, retaining the remaining 40%.

The PGCB didn’t raise many concerns about the new arrangement, which will result in the state receiving a $1 million change-of-control fee. They instead focused most on why Saratoga and SC Gaming aren’t including plans for a physical sportsbook (mobile sports betting is legal in Pennsylvania).

Pennsylvania’s 2017 gaming expansion only allowed for the state’s slots licensees and significant stakeholders to seek Cat. 4 casino privileges. Now, Saratoga, a company that has never operated a slot in the commonwealth, is the majority owner of one such permit.