MGM Resorts CEO Jim Murren is apologizing to employees for the way the company handled a blanket lawsuit filed against more than a thousand victims either killed or injured in the Las Vegas mass shooting.

Jim Murren MGM Resorts lawsuit

Jim Murren is on damage control after MGM Resorts filed a lawsuit against Las Vegas shooting victims that he claims was misconstrued. (Image: MGM Resorts)

Earlier this month, MGM filed litigation in eight states against roughly 1,000 victims that seeks to consolidate any and all claims against the casino operator into one case. The action caused a social media uproar, with the hashtag #BoycottMGM going viral.

“I first want to express my sincere regret that we did not spend more time explaining what we were trying to accomplish,” Murren wrote to employees last Friday. The letter was published to Scribd, but has since been removed.

Many of you were left to read media reports which were misleading and truly awful,” the CEO continued. “To be perfectly clear: MGM Resorts is not suing victims for damages or attempting to extract monetary payment from the victims in any way.”

Instead, Murren attempts to convince employees that the casino company’s lawsuit against October 1 victims is actually in their best interest. Mandalay Bay where the shooter fired from is owned and operated by MGM.

Law on Victims’ Side

Murren concluded that a single case to resolve all lawsuits would be beneficial to all parties.

“More than 2,500 people have filed or threatened to file legal claims against MGM Resorts. If these cases proceed,” Murren said, “victims, which include MGM Resorts employees and families, first responders, and witnesses would face the need to testify over and over again, traveling throughout various court rooms across the US in trial after trial.”

Murren concluded, “We believe [MGM’s legal action] benefits all victims by providing an opportunity for closure in a swift and fair manner.”

Legal experts talking with the Las Vegas Review-Journal say MGM’s lawsuit is a longshot. “In a personal injury situation, you let the plaintiffs go first. They get to pick the time and place of the lawsuits,” law professor and civil litigation expert David Levine explained.

Levine told the media outlet he expects MGM’s legal action to be dismissed.

Proving MGM Fault Difficult

For the families of the 58 people killed and the 1,000 other victims of the shooting, proving fault on behalf of MGM will be difficult. Plaintiff lawyers will need to prove that MGM was careless when it came to its security that allowed gunman Stephen Paddock to load an arsenal’s worth of weapons into his Mandalay Bay suite.

Another lesser-known legal difficulty is that MGM might have some protection under the SAFETY Act, federal legislation that was passed after 9/11 to protect corporations from litigation in the wake of terrorism. Though Paddock hasn’t been linked to a terrorist organization, his motive remains unknown.

The SAFETY Act provides certifications from the US Department of Homeland Security to companies that adequately demonstrate their use of security systems and technology safeguards. Corporations with SAFETY Act designations are typically granted immunity from claims stemming from terroristic acts, and the federal government instead covers such legal expenses.

MGM didn’t hold a SAFETY Act designation on October 1, but the security company it hired for the Route 91 Harvest music concert, did.