61% of Americans Say Prediction Markets Are Gambling
Posted on: March 18, 2026, 01:15h.
Last updated on: March 18, 2026, 01:15h.
- That’s nearly 8x the amount that view event contracts as investing
- 41% use prediction markets to make money
- Young men nearly twice as likely to participate in sports betting, prediction markets as general public
Prediction markets are attempting to position themselves as next-generation financial services or financial technology (fintech) companies, but American view the industry as another form of betting.
A new Ipsos poll conducted in conjunction with the American Institute for Boys and Men (AIBM) says 61% of those queried “view purchasing event contracts on prediction markets as closer to gambling than investing.” Just 8% of respondents said they consider event contracts as comparable to investing.
Among those who have heard of prediction markets, most Americans (91%) and young men (88%) view purchasing event contracts on prediction markets as financially risky, on par with investing in cryptocurrency and placing a sports bet,” according to the poll.
The comparisons to cryptocurrency arrive as some prediction markets are luring unwitting retail traders with event contracts tied to digital asset prices that expire in just five or 15 minutes, often leading to poor outcome because those traders don’t have the technology to compete with professionals.
Prediction Market Familiarity Low…For Now
For some bettors and active traders, it may feel as though prediction markets are ubiquitous and there’s no denying some companies in the space frequently command headlines, but the AIBM/Ipsos poll confirms yes/no exchanges are significantly less well-known than their sportsbook counterparts.
Just 21% of respondents said they’re “somewhat familiar” with prediction compared to 35% that said the same of sportsbooks. The percentage of prediction market awareness is higher among young men, but still the level of sportsbook awareness.
“Even among men ages 18–24, familiarity with prediction markets is still below one-third (29%), though notably higher than the general public,” according to the poll.
Interestingly, prediction market familiarity doesn’t differ among residents of states where sports betting is legal and those living in states where that form of wagering isn’t prohibited. Other surveys indicate prediction market response rates are elevated in states that don’t permit sports wagering, but many bettors in those states say they’ll convert to traditional sports betting when their states approve it.
Division on Prediction Market Regulation
The AIBM/Ipsos poll confirms there’s division among Americans regarding regulation of prediction markets. Fifty-nine percent of respondents said it would be a good idea to regulate prediction markets in comparable fashion to gambling entities while 52% said event contract exchanges should be regulated similarly to financial services firms. Thirty-seven percent said the industry warrants a fresh set of guidelines while a quarter said it should be barred outright.
There’s also little confidence in the ability of prediction markets to prevent insider trading — an increasingly hot-button issue and one that’s drawing political scrutiny.
“Relatedly, just 9% of respondents—and 27% of prediction market users—say they are confident that prediction markets could prevent individuals with non-public information from unfairly profiting on the platforms (13% of all respondents were confident in online sports betting platforms, and 30% were confident in the stock market),” according to AIBM/Ipsos survey.
No comments yet