The Coney Suffers Setback as Community Board Votes Against Land-Use Application
Posted on: January 23, 2025, 08:09h.
Last updated on: January 23, 2025, 10:02h.
The Coney, a proposed $3 billion casino resort development targeting Brooklyn’s famed seaside community, has suffered another setback from the New York City advisory board representing the area.

On Wednesday evening, the full Brooklyn Community Board 13 voted against the project’s land-use application that the developers say would bring a much-needed economic revitalization to the downtrodden Brooklyn neighborhood that decades ago was where Manhattanites escaped during the warmer months. The Coney has promised thousands of good-paying union careers, tens of millions in new local tax dollars annually, and to prop up neighboring businesses by allowing casino rewards members to use their points outside the resort and offer special space inside the property for restauranteurs and retailers.
The resort’s consortium — Thor Equities, Saratoga Casino Holdings, the Chickasaw Nation, and Legends Hospitality — have additionally pledged a $200 community trust that would provide grants for local organizations. The backers also said they would work to improve traffic and infrastructure in the area and open a rooftop public park accessible without needing to enter the casino.
Community officials said Wednesday night they don’t want it. The vote came in at 24-11, with eight abstaining without explanation.
Though the vote was specifically on the project’s Uniform Land Use Review Procedure (ULURP), a standardized part of city planning when projects affect the use of city land, the majority vote could hint that a vote on the casino itself will be a similar outcome. Thor Equities owns the five acres of land at Surf and Stillwell Avenues.
Board Votes No
New York City Community Boards consist of unsalaried members appointed by borough presidents in consultation with borough councilors and local leaders. CBs make recommendations to the city council about zoning and land-use matters.
CBs are advisory only, meaning their vote has no legal bearing. They are most often credited with stopping controversial projects that may have the support of elected officials but are unpopular with the public.
Wednesday night’s vote was a setback for what the developers say would lift up Coney Island, but it wasn’t a defeat. The team told Casino.org that they continue to field new community support.
We are thankful for the more than 10,000 community members who have signed our petition in support, the thousands of neighbors, business owners, and local organizations who have had productive discussions with us over the past years, the hundreds of people who showed up to support our project at tonight’s meeting, and the 11 board members who voted to approve our ULURP application in a divided advisory decision,” said a spokesperson with The Coney.
“While we look forward to continued discussions with stakeholders about the importance of this application in the coming months, we want to be perfectly clear that our ability to move forward in the casino application process is not impacted by whatever ultimate view of this advisory board is made regarding our ability to build sky bridges and enhance the surrounding streets to make them more pedestrian-friendly and flood resistant. It is disappointing that some prominent members of the community have misled others into thinking this ULURP process is a defacto vote on whether or not this project can move forward. As the outright owners of the fully developable lots, The Coney remains the bid most poised to put shovels in the ground on day one to kick start what will be an economic revival for Coney Island and Southern Brooklyn,” the statement continued.
Along with Coney Island, Brooklyn Community Board 13 represents Brighton Beach, Gravesend, and Sea Gate.
Communities Opposing Casinos
There are three downstate casino licenses up for grabs, with each costing a one-time fee of $500 million. The gaming concessions providing Las Vegas-like slot machines, table games, and sports betting are considered the greatest market opportunities in the US gaming industry in decades.
New York lawmakers authorized the commercial casinos to bring new jobs and tourists to the NYC metro area, as well as conventions. The gaming and business taxes are expected to considerably benefit Albany with a major new tax stream.
Local communities, however, haven’t seemed overly eager to welcome one of the undertakings to their backyards. Earlier this month, the Manhattan Community Board on Manhattan’s wealthy West Side voted against a $12 billion overhaul of Hudson Yards West that would include a Wynn Resorts development.
Related News Articles
Coney Island Community Board Land Use Committee Opposes $3B Casino
The Coney Casino Secures First NYC Community Board Backing — With Caveat
Coney Island Residents Not Buying What Casino Developers Selling
Coney Island Cyclone Roller Coaster Located Near Casino Site Shuts Down
Most Popular
Dallas Mavericks Aren’t Moving to Las Vegas, Say Adelson, Dumont
Blackstone May Be Mulling Star Entertainment Buy — With a Catch
Full House Resumes Waukegan Casino Construction After Lawsuit
Most Commented
-
Pennsylvania Township Commissioning Impact Study for Casino Near Penn State
January 24, 2025 — 54 Comments— -
VEGAS DINING NEWS: MGM Resorts Considers Charging for Window Tables
January 11, 2025 — 13 Comments— -
Luxor Las Vegas Guest Sues for Shockingly Bad Experience
January 14, 2025 — 9 Comments— -
Brightline Revises One-Way Fare for LA to Vegas High Speed Train
January 22, 2025 — 8 Comments—
Last Comment ( 1 )
The Coney Island location is the worst place to put a casino out of all the casino proposals. It won't add to the area, it will replace it, wiping away over 150 years of unique New York history that should be protected, preserved, and enhanced, not erased by this massive, and uninteresting casino project. And given the casino developer Joe Sitt's record of loan defaults, lawsuits, and foreclosures, one has to wonder whether he really has the business resources and acumen to build anything of real substance on his properties.