Circle K Seeks to Freeze $12.8M Winning Arizona Lottery Ticket as Deadline Looms

  • Circle K seeks court order over disputed $12.8M lottery ticket
  • Store manager allegedly bought winning ticket after discovering its value
  • Case hinges on ownership rules and alleged insider knowledge use

Circle K is asking an Arizona judge to prevent a $12.8 million winning lottery ticket from expiring in less than three weeks while a legal dispute over ownership is resolved, according to KPNX 12 News.

Circle K lottery dispute, Arizona lottery ticket lawsuit, $12.8M jackpot controversy, lottery ticket ownership law, insider knowledge lottery case
A disputed $12.8 million Arizona lottery ticket has sparked a legal battle over ownership. Circle K is asking a court to freeze the ticket before it expires as the case unfolds. (Image: Shutterstock)

The company is seeking a temporary restraining order (TRO) that would prevent the Arizona Lottery from enforcing the May 23 deadline for the ticket, which is at the center of an unusual quarrel between the convenience store chain and an employee.

Unpaid Ticket

The confusion began on November 24, 2025, when a customer visited a Circle K in Scottsdale and asked a clerk to print multiple tickets for “The Pick,” a state lottery game in which players try to match six numbers drawn later that night.

The clerk printed $85 worth of $1 tickets, but the customer had only $60, leaving 25 tickets unsold on the counter, according to a lawsuit filed in Maricopa County Superior Court. Those tickets remained in the store overnight. One of them turned out to be a winner, worth a $12.8 million jackpot.

The prize is among the largest in the history of The Pick and the biggest in Arizona since 2019.

The next morning, store manager Robert Gawlitza arrived at work, clocked out, removed his uniform, and then bought the leftover tickets, including the winner, from another employee for $10, according to court documents.

Circle K management soon became aware of the transaction and ordered that the ticket be secured at the company’s corporate offices until a court determines who legally owns the prize. The retailer’s complaint names both Gawlitza and the Arizona Lottery as defendants.

In its lawsuit, Circle K cited provisions of the Arizona Administrative Code that say retailers retain property claims to lottery tickets that customers leave unpaid and that remain unsold. The company has asked the court to determine whether the ticket was ever validly sold, who lawfully owns it, and who is entitled to the $12.8 million prize.

Insider Knowledge?

At issue is whether the unpaid, printed tickets should be treated as the retailer’s inventory, or whether Gawlitza’s purchase after the draw was valid – or an improper use of insider knowledge.

“Who goes out to their car and changes their clothing to come in to purchase tickets unless you have a plan?” attorney Josh Kolsrud asked 12 News. “If there’s any evidence that he was aware of what was going on, and used that knowledge, that insider knowledge, to buy that ticket, Circle K wins this case.”

A hearing is scheduled for May 15.

Philip Conneller
Philip Conneller Senior Reporter

In Philip Conneller’s eight years with Casino.org, he has covered the gaming industry from Las Vegas to Macau and everything in between. He currently focuses his coverage on gaming law, white-collar crime, global money laundering, tribal gaming, politics, and regulation.

Philip was the original features editor for poker’s Bluff Magazine and editor for Bluff Europe, which he helped launch. His writing has also been featured in ESPN, Forbes, Time Out, The Sun, and The Daily Star, as well as iGaming Business, eGaming Review, and numerous other industry news and tech websites.

His news stories for Casino.org/news have been linked by The Washington Post, The Daily Mail, People Magazine, and Jimmy Fallon's Tonight Show, among many others.

Philip once won $20,000 with 7-2 off-suit. He has been reprimanded for unwittingly playing Elton John’s piano on two separate occasions on both sides of the Atlantic.

He became a writer because he is a lousy pianist.

Philip lives outside London with his wife and children, where he spends his time agonizing about Arsenal FC.

Contact Philip at philip.conneller@casino.org.

Comments icon

Conversation (1 comment)

+ Add a comment
  • B
    Bari May 6, 2026
    1st the employees only paid 10.00. So he only bought some of the tickets that weren't originally taken. The customer picked the tickets they… 1st the employees only paid 10.00. So he only bought some of the tickets that weren't originally taken. The customer picked the tickets they wanted and paid for. So what they left behind they shouldn't have a claim to. According to lottery rules does the store own it because they didn't pay for it either? Doesn't the store get a kickback ftom winning tickets? What's the rule for the employee to buy a ticket printed and after the drawing ? Maybe they could split it between all 3 unless do someone violated the rules or policy.
    Reply

Write a comment

Your email address will not be published.